If it’s a bike lane, then why are cars parked in it? If it’s legal to park (per the signs on the lamp posts) then why is it marked as a bike lane? Even the long-term bike folks in Palo Alto can’t fully explain the history of these decades-old bike lanes. Either the parked cars or the bike lane have to go. Sadly, I know which one will.
Location: Cowper Street near Loma Verde Avenue in Palo Alto, California, USA
This site features a genealogy blog about the Ville Platte Louisiana area African descendant families of Frank, Jason, Denton, Ruben, Leday, Laughtin, Joseph
African Americans in the 19th Century: Slavery, Resistance, Abolition, the Civil War, Emancipation, Reconstruction, and the Nadir
Southern family stories with a dash of spice
Stories About Urbanism, Adaptation, and Resilience
Feminist reflections on fitness, sport, and health
fun.fashion.art and design
The Art and Craft of Blogging
A blog for bike shops
Drunk on truth to stupid baby power.
A fine WordPress.com site
Living the urban/bicycle life
Exploring Santa Clara County's urban limits
what's on my mind: food, fashion, marketing, cities, tech & more
Adventures in city cycling
Exploring with kids in the outdoors and in homeschool
How and where to shop by bike in Silicon Valley, California
The blog of the Beautiful You MRKH Foundation www.beautifulyoumrkh.org
Rachel Unger
July 9, 2012 at 5:49 pm
Middlefield is the same, isn’t it? Bike lane, but cars can park there? Share the road, I guess. Even when not moving.
ladyfleur
July 9, 2012 at 6:07 pm
The Middlefield ones are better. Cars can only park in the bike lanes at night and on weekends. The Cowper ones are ok for car parking 24/7.
Ken
July 10, 2012 at 2:04 am
We have exactly the same problems in the UK. I’m a bit of a reactionary: I believe that when there is a problem like this the local mayor and all the officials involved in the planning process should be required to ride bicycles past the problem at rush hour, then explain why their decisions were made. Not much chance of it happening but it’s a nice thought!
ladyfleur
July 10, 2012 at 8:42 am
Having decision makers use the facilities they’re planning is so obvious, yet rarely done. For these bike lanes, I suspect they put them in without considering the impact of removing residential car parking and the residents fought back.
djconnel
July 12, 2012 at 6:28 am
The public cost of parking is at least equal to the rental cost of the land occupied. And given the product of the size of cars in Palo Alto and the rental cost, I think it’s obvious that’s under-appreciated.
ladyfleur
July 12, 2012 at 7:12 am
God forbid they park their cars in their two car garages or two car driveways. I resent parked cars having precedence over moving bicycles the most.